2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 583 kg more than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Ram. (510 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Armada | Ram |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 510 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 132 L |