2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (102 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 864 kg more than 2010 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Nissan | Fiat |
Model | Armada | Stilo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 58 L |