2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Ford F-350
To start off, 2010 Ford F-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Ford F-350. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford F-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1308 kg more than 2010 Ford F-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford F-350. (495 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford F-350.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Armada | F-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 144 L |