2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
