2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 544 kg more than 2010 Nissan GT-R.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Armada | GT-R |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 485 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2779 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 74 L |
