2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Porsche Cayman
To start off, 2010 Porsche Cayman is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Porsche Cayman. (265 HP @ 7200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Porsche Cayman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 944 kg more than 2010 Porsche Cayman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Porsche Cayman. (299 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Porsche Cayman.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Porsche Cayman | |
Make | Nissan | Porsche |
Model | Armada | Cayman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 299 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4376 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1303 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2416 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 64 L |