2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2011 Audi TT. (265 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 876 kg more than 2011 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Audi TT. (349 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | Nissan | Audi |
| Model | Armada | TT |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2416 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4199 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1349 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |
