2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 157 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Armada | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |