2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 341 kg more than 2004 Nissan Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser (543 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 543 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 2615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1971 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 93 L |