2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 396 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Armada | Captiva |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 230 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1878 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 65 L |