2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2012 Chrysler 300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2012 Chrysler 300. (292 HP @ 6350 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 446 kg more than 2012 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chrysler 300. (352 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2012 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Nissan | Chrysler |
Model | Armada | 300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 352 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1828 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1486 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3053 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 72 L |