2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1151 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C3. (161 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Nissan | Citroen |
Model | Armada | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 82 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1123 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 45 L |