2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2012 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Calais.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Armada | Calais |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 350 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |