2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 144 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (360 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2685 mm |
