2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Honda Fit
To start off, 2012 Honda Fit is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2012 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1122 kg more than 2012 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2012 Honda Fit | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Armada | Fit |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2499 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 40 L |