2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 823 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Armada | C30 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |
