2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Acura TL
To start off, 2013 Acura TL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 305 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 616 kg more than 2013 Acura TL.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2013 Acura TL | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | Armada | TL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 370 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2416 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2118 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1452 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 70 L |