2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 BMW 7 Series
To start off, 2013 BMW 7 Series is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW 7 Series (439 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW 7 Series should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 97 kg more than 2013 BMW 7 Series.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW 7 Series (651 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2013 BMW 7 Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2013 BMW 7 Series | |
Make | Nissan | BMW |
Model | Armada | 7 Series |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 439 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 651 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0 :1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 2177 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5214 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2134 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 80 L |