2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (488 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 394 kg more than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE. (450 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
Model | Armada | F-TYPE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 488 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 450 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2909 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |