2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2013 Mini Cooper. (208 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2013 Mini Cooper. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 989 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Nissan | Mini |
Model | Armada | Cooper |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1432 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 50 L |