2004 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2004 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Bluebird | Calais |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 344 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |