2004 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 380 kg more than 2004 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2004 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Nissan | Mitsubishi |
Model | Bluebird | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |