2004 Nissan Cima vs. 2010 BMW 120
To start off, 2010 BMW 120 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Cima weights approximately 245 kg more than 2010 BMW 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 BMW 120 has automatic transmission and 2004 Nissan Cima has manual transmission. 2004 Nissan Cima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 BMW 120 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Cima | 2010 BMW 120 | |
Make | Nissan | BMW |
Model | Cima | 120 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4500 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1760 mm |