2004 Nissan Frontier vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (181 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 838 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (274 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Frontier | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Frontier | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3278 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 274 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 18.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 22 L |