2004 Nissan Frontier vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 481 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (274 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Frontier | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Frontier | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3278 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 274 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1786 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 65 L |