2004 Nissan Frontier vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (210 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Frontier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 81 kg more than 2010 Audi A6.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (334 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi A6. (329 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Frontier | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Frontier | A6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3278 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 334 Nm | 329 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1831 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2842 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 80 L |