2004 Nissan Frontier vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (301 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Frontier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 51 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (363 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (274 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Frontier | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Frontier | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3278 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 274 Nm | 363 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1786 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1449 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 72 L |