2004 Nissan Frontier vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Frontier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 213 kg more than 2013 Nissan Z.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (274 Nm). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Frontier | 2013 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Frontier | Z |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3278 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 274 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 11:01:00 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1786 kg | 1573 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4246 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1326 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 72 L |
