2004 Nissan Frontier vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Frontier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 950 kg more than 2004 Nissan Frontier. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (209 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Frontier.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Nissan Frontier 2013 Toyota Tundra
Make Nissan Toyota
Model Frontier Tundra
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2488 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 376 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 544 Nm
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 102 mm
Number of Seats 2 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 2430 kg
Vehicle Length 5160 mm 6290 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1925 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 4180 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.7 L/100km 11 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.7 L/100km 15.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 100 L