2004 Nissan Murano vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 304 kg more than 2004 Nissan Murano.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Murano | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Murano | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3507 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1796 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 81 L |
