2004 Nissan Murano vs. 1985 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Pontiac Grand Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Pontiac Grand Am would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1985 Pontiac Grand Am. (90 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1985 Pontiac Grand Am. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 666 kg more than 1985 Pontiac Grand Am. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Pontiac Grand Am. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (328 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Pontiac Grand Am. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Pontiac Grand Am.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Murano | 1985 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Nissan | Pontiac |
Model | Murano | Grand Am |
Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 2471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 179 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1796 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2630 mm |