2004 Nissan Murano vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Murano would be higher.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (328 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Murano | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Murano | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 1867 mm |
