2004 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (231 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 538 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (363 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Pathfinder | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3507 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1808 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |
