2004 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (107 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 731 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (372 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (155 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Pathfinder | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3489 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 107 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1756 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 43 L |
