2004 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZT would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 465 kg more than 2003 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (359 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT. (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Pathfinder | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Nissan | MG |
Model | Pathfinder | ZT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |