2004 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Compass. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 362 kg more than 2010 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (372 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Compass. (223 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Pathfinder | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Nissan | Jeep |
Model | Pathfinder | Compass |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3489 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 223 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1756 kg | 1394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 51 L |