2004 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2010 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2010 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 881 kg more than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (494 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. (372 Nm). This means 2010 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Pathfinder | 2010 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Nissan | Lincoln |
Model | Pathfinder | Navigator |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3489 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 494 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1756 kg | 2637 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1989 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 106 L |