2004 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 212 kg more than 2012 Volvo C70.
Because 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. (359 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Pathfinder | C70 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 241 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1952 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |
