2004 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2013 Volvo XC60. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo XC60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Nissan Pathfinder.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (372 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC60. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Pathfinder | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Pathfinder | XC60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3489 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1756 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |