2004 Nissan Quest vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Quest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Quest would be higher. At 3,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Quest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Quest (240 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Quest should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Quest (325 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Quest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Quest | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Quest | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3495 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |