2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 (543 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 2010 Ford F-250. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1707 kg more than 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford F-250. (494 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | R 390 GT1 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 543 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 637 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3967 mm |