2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 (543 HP) has 262 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (281 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan R 390 GT1 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | R 390 GT1 | UTE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 543 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 637 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |