2004 Nissan Sentra vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Nissan Sentra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Sentra (127 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 1 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Sentra (175 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Sentra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Sentra | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Sentra | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |