2004 Nissan Titan vs. 2011 Audi Q7
To start off, 2011 Audi Q7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2011 Audi Q7. (225 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi Q7 weights approximately 127 kg more than 2004 Nissan Titan.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi Q7 (550 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Titan. (514 Nm). This means 2011 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Titan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Titan | 2011 Audi Q7 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Titan | Q7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 550 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2398 kg | 2525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 3002 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 100 L |