2004 Nissan Titan vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Titan weights approximately 336 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-09. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda CX-09. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (366 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Titan | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Titan | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 514 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2398 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 76 L |
