2004 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,485 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (163 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan X-Trail | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | X-Trail | Pixo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2485 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 191 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2360 mm |