2004 Nissan Xterra vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Xterra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Xterra would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Xterra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Xterra (181 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Xterra should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Xterra weights approximately 92 kg more than 2006 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Xterra (270 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Xterra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Xterra | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Xterra | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3278 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1658 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 68 L |