2004 Nissan Xterra vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Xterra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Xterra would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V50 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Xterra. (138 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Xterra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Xterra weights approximately 166 kg more than 2009 Volvo V50.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo V50 (230 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Xterra. (209 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Xterra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Xterra | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Xterra | V50 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1628 kg | 1462 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 62 L |