2004 Nissan Xterra vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Xterra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Xterra would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Xterra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Xterra. (181 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Xterra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 166 kg more than 2004 Nissan Xterra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac SRX (302 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Xterra. (270 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Xterra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Xterra | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Xterra | SRX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3278 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6950 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 302 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 79 L |