2004 Nissan Xterra vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Xterra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Xterra would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Xterra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Xterra (181 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Xterra should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Xterra weights approximately 400 kg more than 2010 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Xterra (270 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Xterra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Xterra | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Nissan | Fiat |
Model | Xterra | Bravo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3278 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 206 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 58 L |